CBA/ABATE Gaston Co.

Home | IN MEMORIAL | Legislative | Safety&Education/MSAP | Events | Gaston Area Bike Nites | Sponsers | Links | History

News You CanUse

Click Here for Helmet Citation Committee Info

DOT Labeling

Mr. Wayne Ivie
Manager, Vehicle Support Service Section       http://isearch.nhtsa.gov/files/3315o.html
Oregon Department of Transportation
1905 Lana Avenue NE
Salem
, OR 97314

Dear Mr. Ivie:

This responds to your letter seeking information about the labeling requirements in Standard No. 218, Motorcycle Helmets (49 CFR 571.218). You noted that Oregon recently enacted a mandatory helmet use law which adopted Standard No. 218 as the minimum standard for helmets. You correctly noted that section S5.6.1 of Standard No. 218 requires subject motorcycle helmets to be permanently and legibly labeled with specified information, including the symbol "DOT" as a certification that the helmet complies with Standard No. 218. However, you stated that you have received reports that the labeling required by Standard No. 218 is not present on many helmets, either because it has fallen off or been removed by someone. You said that there is often no other identification of the manufacturer or brand name on the helmet. Accordingly, it is not possible for the owner of a helmet without the Standard 218 label present to contact a dealer or manufacturer for information about the helmet. You then asked several questions about the labeling requirements set forth in Standard No. 218.

Before answering your specific questions, I would like to provide some general background information on Standard No. 218. Prior to October 3, 1988, Standard No. 218 applied only to helmets that could be placed on the size C headform. The helmet manufacturers estimated that approximately 90 percent of all motorcycle helmets were subject to Standard No. 218, because they could be placed on the size C headform. However, helmets manufactured before October 3, 1988 that could not be placed on the size C headform (these were typically smaller sizes of helmets) were not subject to Standard No. 218. Hence, manufacturers of helmets that could not be placed on the size C headform were not required by Standard No. 218 or any of our other regulations to label any information on these helmets. In fact, manufacturers could not label the DOT certification symbol on those helmets that were not subject to Standard No. 218. See the enclosed December 4, 1987 letter to Mr. Hoppe for more information on this subject.

We published a final rule on April 6, 1988 that extended the requirements of Standard No. 218 to all motorcycle helmet sizes (53 FR 11280). This rule became effective on October 3, 1988. Accordingly, all motorcycle helmets manufactured on or after October 3, 1988 are subject to Standard No. 218 and must be labeled in accordance with the requirements of S5.6 of that standard.

With this background, your question can be answered as follows. For the approximately 10 percent of helmets manufactured before October 3, 1988 that could not be placed on the size C headform, Standard No. 218 did not apply to them, so there was no requirement for any information to be labeled on these helmets. Any such helmets would not display a "DOT sticker" because they were not required or permitted to display such a sticker when they were new, not because the sticker "fell off" or was removed.

However, Standard No. 218 applied to approximately 90 percent of all helmets manufactured before October 3, 1988 and applies to every motorcycle helmet manufactured on or after that date. For those helmets, S5.6.1 of Standard No. 218 requires that: "Each helmet shall be permanently and legibly labeled . . ." with the manufacturers name or identification, the precise model designation, the size, the month and year of manufacture, the DOT certification mark, and warning instructions. (emphasis added) In an October 16, 1973 letter to the Cycraft Co., NHTSA stated that the requirement that helmets be permanently labeled prohibits the use of labels that can be removed easily by hand without tools or chemicals.

You stated that you have heard of two reasons why helmets that originally had a DOT certification label would no longer have such a label. One of the reasons was that the affixed label was a "sticker" and it "fell off." Standard No. 218 permits manufacturers to label the required information on the helmet by means of a "sticker," provided that the label is permanent and legible and contains all the information required by S5.6. A "sticker" that falls off the helmet would not appear to be permanent within the meaning of Standard No. 218, so this would be an apparent noncompliance with the standard. If you have any evidence that "stickers" are falling off helmets, please forward that information to our Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance at this address, and we will take appropriate actions.

The second reason that you have heard for helmets no longer having the labeling required by Standard No. 218 is that someone removed the label to paint the helmet and failed to put the label back on the helmet. Section 108(a)(2)(A) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (15 U.S.C 1397(a)(2)(A)) prohibits any manufacturer, distributor, dealer, or repair business from "knowingly render[ing] inoperative any device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment in compliance with an applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standard." In this case, the label on motorcycle helmets is a device or element of design installed on the helmet in compliance with Standard No. 218. If a manufacturer, distributor, dealer, or repair business removed that label and failed to put it back on the helmet, then those entities would be rendering the label inoperative, in violation of Federal law. Again, if you have any evidence that violations of Federal law have occurred in your State, please forward that evidence to our Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance and we will take appropriate actions.

Please note that Federal law does not prohibit the helmet's owner or any other person that is not a manufacturer, distributor, dealer, or repair business from removing the label from motorcycle helmets. Thus, the owner of a motorcycle helmet is permitted to remove the label from his or her helmet for any reason without violating any provision of Federal law. The individual States are free to establish requirements for motorcycle helmets used in their State, and could prohibit an owner from removing the label.

You suggested that the problem of missing labels could be solved if this agency were to require that the DOT symbol be embossed on or in the helmet. NHTSA considered and rejected this suggestion 15 years ago when it established Standard No. 218. In the August 20, 1973 preamble to the final rule that established FMVSS 218, we said:

With respect to providing important safety information in the form of labeling, one comment recommended that, due to possible label deterioration, both the manufacturer's identification and the helmet model designation should be permanently marked by etching, branding, stamping, embossing, or molding on the exterior of the helmet shell or on a permanently attached component so as to be visible when the helmet is in use. The NHTSA has determined that the practical effect of this recommendation is accomplished by requiring each helmet to be permanently and legibly labeled. The method to be used to permanently and legibly affix a label for each helmet is therefore left to the discretion of the manufacturer. (38 FR 22391)

You finally asked if other jurisdictions have informed NHTSA of similar problems and sought suggestions on methods to resolve the situation where an apparently undamaged helmet would be in compliance with the standard except that it is not properly labeled. As noted above, approximately 10 percent of the motorcycle helmets manufactured before October 3, 1988 were not subject to Standard No. 218 and were not required to be labeled. To my knowledge, no other jurisdictions have informed this agency of problems akin to those raised in your letter aside from more general questions about labeling. I hope this information is helpful. If you have any further questions or need some more information on this subject, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Marvin Shaw of my staff at this address, or by telephone at (202) 366-2992.

Sincerely,

Erika Z. Jones Chief Counsel

The "NEW" Helmet law ( which is really the OLD helmet law) takes effect on January 1 2008. There is a lot of mis-information being given on this. Human nature is to take a story and expound on it. The actual facts sometimes get confused.Here is the actual wording of the new law;
20‑140.4.
(2)       Unless the operator and all passengers thereon wear on their heads, with a retention strap properly secured, safety helmets of a type that complies with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 218.(b)       Violation of any provision of this section shall not be considered negligence per se or contributory negligence per se in any civil action.(c)       Any person convicted of violating this section shall have committed an infraction and shall be fined according to G.S. 20‑135.2A(e) and (f)."
Here is the statute that describes the penalty;
20‑135.2A.
(e)       Any driver or front seat passenger who fails to wear a seat belt as required by this section shall have committed an infraction and shall pay a penalty of twenty‑five dollars ($25.00) plus court costs in the sum of seventy‑five dollars ($75.00). Any rear seat occupant of a vehicle who fails to wear a seat belt as required by this section shall have committed an infraction and shall pay a penalty of ten dollars ($10.00) and no court costs. Court costs assessed under this section are for the support of the General Court of Justice and shall be remitted to the State Treasurer. Conviction of an infraction under this section has no other consequence.(f)        No drivers license points or insurance surcharge shall be assessed on account of violation of this section.
I have heard "stories" from people in the past few weeks telling about different amounts being charged in different places. This is entirely possible, but if you know your rights you can beat the sentencing part.

Here are some general guidelines if you stopped for a Helmet Law Violation
1) Don't Volunteer any information. Anything you say can and will be held against you
2) Always refer to your headgear as a "Safety Helmet"
3) Do not admit knowledge of committing any violation. 
4) If questioned, tell the officer you believe your helmet complies with current NC law.
5) Ask the reason you were pulled over (probable cause).
6) Ask the officer exactly how and why the helmet law had been violated.
7) If threatened with being detained; ask what legal authority there is to prevent you from proceeding without a legal helmet and impounding the motorcycle.
8) If the officer continues to detain you, ask the officer "Am I under arrest?"
9) Remember to be respectful and courteous. In the majority of traffic stops the officer is only doing his job.
10) As soon as possible write the details of the incident down.  Call 919-662-6229 and report the incident. 


ATTENTION ALL NORTH CAROLINA MOTORCYCLE RIDERS
“To a person who consents, no injustice is done”

NORTH CAROLINA'S CURRENT HELMET LAW IS IN EFFECT UNTIL JANUARY 1, 2008
The current standards dictate:
“The operator of a motorcycle, and all passengers thereon, must wear safety helmets of a type approved by the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles.”
The NC DOT has declared (in writing) that the Commissioner does not approve helmets (Gardner, Jan 2007).  Therefore, any type of helmet that you wear on your head is appropriate and legal in North Carolina.  This legal standard has been upheld in the North Carolina courts, several times (i.e., NC v Barker; NC v Ruddock; NC v Boger; NC V Malpass).
During the 2007 legislative session, North Carolina's elected officials voted to change the existing helmet law.
NORTH CAROLINA'S HELMET LAW CHANGES BECOME EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2008
The new standards dictate:
“The operator of a motorcycle, and all passengers thereon, must wear on their heads, with a retention strap properly secured, safety helmets of a type that complies with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 218.”
Recently, overzealous Law Enforcement Officers in a variety of locations across North Carolina, have begun to write citations for violations of the law that does not take effect until next year.  Or, to infer that the current statute requires DOT FMVSS 218 helmets.
These citations are NOT enforceable.
DO NOT pay the $100 fine.

PREMATURE ENFORCEMENT
In response to the premature enforcement of the new standards, CBA/ABATE of NC's Helmet Citation Defense Project has developed a portfolio of materials to assist riders in preparing a legal defense against these illegal citations.

Do NOT pay the fine for an ILLEGAL ticket. 

We are NOT attorneys but we are FREEDOM LOVING BIKERS experienced in the preparation of the materials needed to defend against oppressive helmet laws.  We want to lend our support YOUR defense efforts.
              JOIN US! Go to court and fight this abuse of authority.
For more information, or to get involved in the activities of the
CBA/ABATE of North Carolina's Helmet Citation Defense Project
Contact: Super-Susan at 828-855-0677 or Doc Ski at 919-662-6229
email the NCHCD Project at NCHCDP@msn.com


Weather Forecasts | Weather Maps | Weather Radar